openskills.info

Self-Awareness and Reflection

Seeing yourself roughly as others do, and checking rather than assuming.

Self-awareness has two halves that come apart easily. The inside half is knowing your own values, patterns and reactions. The outside half is knowing how you actually land on other people — and those two can diverge for years without anything forcing a correction, because almost nobody volunteers the information. Reflection is how you work on the first half, and it has a well-known failure mode: think about yourself long enough, unprompted, and you will usually arrive at a flattering and internally consistent account. The outside half can only come from asking, and the asking has to be specific enough that people can answer it honestly without it becoming a conversation about your feelings.

Mostly Harmless

The Retrospective Novelist

Reflects seriously and at length after every difficult episode, and arrives without fail at a narrative in which their own conduct was reasonable given what they knew at the time. The reflection is genuine. The conclusion is load-bearing and was, on inspection, never really at risk. Emerges from each session of hard self-examination with their self-image intact and a slightly improved understanding of what everyone else did wrong, then records the whole exercise as evidence of being someone who reflects.

The Feedback Sponge

Absorbs every piece of criticism as complete and final truth, and restructures accordingly, immediately. Told once that a presentation was too detailed, strips the next one to four slides; told that one was thin, returns with forty. Has no filter for whether a given observation is representative, informed, or even about them, and so oscillates permanently, exhausting themselves and confusing everyone who works with them by never twice being the same person.

The Strengths Reciter

Has done the assessment, knows the four-letter code, and can list their development areas fluently on request. Deploys them pre-emptively as terms of engagement rather than as things to work on: "I'm just not a detail person," delivered warmly, some minutes before handing over a document full of errors. Has converted self-knowledge, at considerable cost in workshops, into a standing exemption that other people are now expected to plan around.

The Mirror Avoider

Has never once asked a colleague how they come across, and so operates on a self-image assembled entirely from the inside, with no external input for somewhere between five and twenty years. Believes themselves approachable, concise, and hard to offend. Two of the three are contested by everyone who reports to them, and the mechanism by which this information might travel upward has never been built, which is itself the third data point.

Scenarios

Two people in six months have described you as "intense" in feedback. You don't experience yourself that way. What would you do — weigh it against your own sense of how you operate, or ask three people you trust for a specific example of when it showed up?

You're replaying a meeting that went badly and have arrived at an explanation centering on someone else's behavior. What would you do — accept it, since it's probably partly true, or ask what your own contribution would look like described by someone who dislikes you?

Your personality assessment says you're weak on follow-through, and it's accurate. What would you do — tell people so they can plan around it, or treat it as the thing to build a system against?

Takeaway

  • Ask for the outside view directly. It won't arrive on its own, and seniority makes it arrive even less.
  • Ask about specific situations, not about yourself in general. "How did I come across in that review?" gets an answer; "what am I like?" doesn't.
  • Notice when your reflection always exonerates you. A process that never changes your mind isn't examining anything.
  • Weigh feedback by whether it repeats, not by how recently you heard it. One remark is data; the same remark from three people is a pattern.
  • Treat a known weakness as something to build a workaround for, not as a standing exemption you announce in advance.

Go deeper

Awesome Links