Scenarios
You're asked to approve something that could be undone next month at
almost no cost. What would you do — give it the same scrutiny as
anything else with your name on it, or decide quickly and spend the
saved time on the migration nobody has reviewed?
A decision you made last year turned out badly. What would you do —
treat it as a mistake to learn from, or first ask whether you'd make the
same call again given only what you knew at the time?
Your team has been "gathering more information" on a choice for six
weeks. What would you do — keep gathering, or write down what specific
piece of information would actually change the answer, and set a date?
Takeaway
- Sort by reversibility first. Cheap-to-undo decisions deserve speed,
not process.
- Write down what would change your mind before you decide. It's the
only way to tell later whether you were wrong or just unlucky.
- Name the owner. A decision everyone is consulted on and nobody owns
gets made by a deadline instead.
- Judge past decisions on the reasoning available at the time, out loud,
especially when the outcome was bad.
- Watch for the framework being tuned to the answer. If the weights
moved after you saw the result, you made the decision first.